🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 810+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Retro Vintage Pearl Geometric Copper Electroplating Earrings

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.9 out of 5(810 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$31.9​
$53.17
Sale
βœ“ at no charge distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

None

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy distribution
↩️
functional Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Retro Vintage Pearl Geometric Copper Electroplating Earrings

None

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 979673

Category: Women > Jewelry >

Original Price:$53.17 USD

Sale Price:$31.9 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5997 reviews
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific value for money
The Retro Vintage Pearl Geometric Copper Electroplating Earrings works fine for my personal use.
19 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez
1 month ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
Personally, it fits my needs which feels reasonable.
5 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Fort Worth, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
really happy
really smooth experience buying Retro Vintage Pearl Geometric Copper Electroplating Earrings.
46 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
The Retro Vintage Pearl Geometric Copper Electroplating Earrings is plain enough to handle.
26 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
The Retro Vintage Pearl Geometric Copper Electroplating Earrings doesn’t require special care to use.
49 people found this helpful